tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4289755320544469994.post7902557032487877780..comments2023-11-05T01:44:04.732-08:00Comments on 360 Rumors: Vuze update: TV network exposure; tutorials; new samples360 Rumorshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01173469932778454315noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4289755320544469994.post-36971967714944331552017-05-18T07:46:06.798-07:002017-05-18T07:46:06.798-07:00Hi Mic - I have plenty of bandwidth.
Even assuming...Hi Mic - I have plenty of bandwidth.<br />Even assuming I am not viewing these correctly the stitching is not good. That makes all the difference.<br />I also checked the B&H Photo site. The feedback is not good.Farpointhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08731240331695265837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4289755320544469994.post-36050383931888605432017-05-17T16:28:54.719-07:002017-05-17T16:28:54.719-07:00Hi Farpoint. I assure you the windmill video is by...Hi Farpoint. I assure you the windmill video is by a Vuze camera. But it was rendered in 2D, which makes me wonder whether your computer is viewing at a lower resolution due to bandwidth issues? Did you manually select the 4k resolution setting?<br /><br />Best regards,<br />Mic360 Rumorshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01173469932778454315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4289755320544469994.post-4757177176998605812017-05-17T15:57:56.099-07:002017-05-17T15:57:56.099-07:00One more comment:
The video of the windmill is muc...One more comment:<br />The video of the windmill is much better. Is it even the same camera?<br />How much post production was done? You can easily see the difference from the others.Farpointhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08731240331695265837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4289755320544469994.post-17611411318199759962017-05-17T14:03:02.929-07:002017-05-17T14:03:02.929-07:00I understand what your saying but the stitching is...I understand what your saying but the stitching is really bad with close objects.<br />The resolution is poor - looks smeared.<br />This is not going to change if viewed in 2D or 3D.<br />Also, $800 is not cheap.Farpointhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08731240331695265837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4289755320544469994.post-27537881859058052432017-05-17T08:30:25.800-07:002017-05-17T08:30:25.800-07:00Hi there! Thanks for taking the time to comment. ...Hi there! Thanks for taking the time to comment. Did you see it in 3D or just 2D? Because if you saw it just in 2D, then it's kind of like evaluating a Ferrari by driving it down surface streets at 35 mph. The stitching is definitely not as good as that of a typical 2-lens consumer camera where the lenses are much closer to each other. But I think the frame of reference should be other 3D 360 rigs (not just in terms of stitch quality, but capturing, stitching, and of course, cost). What do you think?<br />Best regards,<br />Mic360 Rumorshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01173469932778454315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4289755320544469994.post-7282957325835332172017-05-17T07:43:49.025-07:002017-05-17T07:43:49.025-07:00The stitching & the video quality is poor.
Why...The stitching & the video quality is poor.<br />Why this is getting so much press is a mystery.Farpointhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08731240331695265837noreply@blogger.com